Hyperlink Collection

Please note: Visible already in the - certainly known to many people - description of the "scribes" in the Bible, it may appear quite unexpected and strange, what people who make other peoples' money in the field of the so named "jurisdiction" may think regarding questions concerning real life. The Bible also shows that it is not important whether the scribes' opinion be objectively correct or plausible - if they come up with any idea, it is just dangerous not to carefully observe their insights.

As the "scribes" have now bothered with the content of files, which are stored on some computers, from where people or machines can acquire copies of these files, they are apparently of the opinion that they need to dictate what is contained in such files. The scribes also know which thoughts of other persons an author of such files "adopts" (whatever that means, but as the payment of some scribes is governed by the value of a cause, we'd rather expect it to be something expensive), and they also know what he would support even if it were against the law. They know everything, even (or especially when) the author does not provide any statement about anything like that at all - if the author only ever gives any reference to any single other file, be it directly, or indirectly via other files. And the knowledge of the scribes about the author's opinion and intention also includes all possible changes of any referenced file that may occur in the future or may have occured in the past, and all the billions of other files to which any of the referenced files may point, directly, or via any other file as well. If anywhere in the WWW (or in other gruel spaces said to exist in the Internet) any reference should exist to any forbidden and highly dangerous book in any library of the world - or even more horrifying: to any common phrase or a childrens' song improved by addition of a "TM" or "(C)" - and if any reference from a file of an author should point to that place even after 1.000 steps - the scribes may still be very sure, at least whenever they do especially carefully judge, that such a finding can support the raid of one's home, seizure of equipment, observation, imprisonment, and other expensive action to protect the community. As far as links in the WWW are concerned, the idea that guilt (even more: malicious intention) should be proven before it can be penalized, has obviously been abandoned as well as any other aspect of causality and adequacy.

So far, so bad. To guard myself from undesired effects of such IMHO quite strange persuasions of our contemporary scribes, which probably exist given some recent events, I'm afraid I have to formally point out that I do not adopt (whatever that means) nor accept the content of any WWW site referenced below as substantiated by myself, that I don't check the content of these sites, and that any reader (man or machine) follows these links at their own risk. I want to make it especially clear for the case that, should any of the links in my files, or any link in the whole WWW, or any reference in any terrestrial or extra-terrestial piece of information, now, or at any time in the past, or at any time in the future, directly, or via any number of indirect steps, point to any file which might be illegal in any country due to any legal regulation, or merely morally, culturally, or religiously questionable, or designed using the wrong colours or the wrong editor, it is definitely not my intention to endorse or to further any such activities or findings.

Should any part of this statements be invalid (e.g. due to a far too broad conception, "outdated" orthography, missing translation into all European languages or into all languages of the Universe), this shall not invalidate all of the statement, but merely shall the individual invalid part be termed void, whereas any other parts which may be advantageous for me shall remain in effect.

Should you be of the opinion that this declaration were void because it were not in written form (however you might derive that opinion, and whether I would think that were a strange opinion, but be assured that there are people around who would share it anyway), you may either print this file for yourself or request a printed version from me against reimbursement of my expenses for time and ressources.

Well, sorry. Apparently you just have to write such declarations if you can't otherwise protect yourself from people, who apparently focus on how to make money with "Jurisdiction", "Politics" and "Security", and have occupied posts and positions with public legitimation for that purpose.